Council
Fifteen auditors, two engines, four gates
Agentic AI · Analytics governance · 2026
Drop a case in — workbooks, decks, briefs, PDFs — and it parses them in your browser, indexes them, then works out what the data actually is before anyone is allowed to compute anything. Fifteen specialist auditors review the analysis, each with a different lens: math, causality, definitions, sensitivity, chart integrity, the counter-story, the question that breaks your weakest claim. Every figure is computed twice, by SQL and by an independent reducer that shares no code with it. If they disagree, the figure cannot become a claim.
↳ How it fitsThe premise is that a model is very good at noticing what an analysis failed to consider, and unfit to be the thing that decides what is true. So the jobs are split. Models argue; engines compute; a person signs. Disagreement is never settled by counting votes — it runs a fixed ladder of source quality, formula reproducibility, definition consistency, and then a human, with dissent preserved into the export. Given a real portfolio workbook it re-derives the grain, tells split records apart from duplicates, works out that inventory is a level rather than a flow, and finds the partial reporting week — all from structure, with nothing about the case hardcoded.